I think it should be an extra user action, not the text confirming key itself, to avoid selecting the next shape unintentionally.
Well I guess we can't always get what we want. Let's hope Moho improves the API regarding text fields. Still an amazing tool.

+1. Any way of naming the shapes one by one without having to take the mouse would be very welcome. For me the natural instinct was to press enter to confirm the text and then arrow down, but enter doesn't work as you already know and the arrow down key is taken by the currently selected shape tool....

synthsin75 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 1:01 pm Oops. Thanks Daxel, I edited the post.

Thanks! Added to my notes. It sounds super useful because I've had problems with the jumping points and the new mode sounds like it's going to held much better against combining meshes other rigging features.

It seems that we have the same problem with different solutions that are needed to be done. Have you tried it with PSD files? Edited: I face the problem not on Frame 0, but other than frame 0. No, I haven't been working with PSD's. And yes, the slowdown didn't happen on frame 0 here, it seems to be...

With frame-dependent disabled, the points controlled by the mesh are always the points that are within the triangle or quad on frame zero, even if you move the point elsewhere manually. This is generally more stable, since points won't jump around as they move through the influence of multiple mesh...

Only disabling the effect doesn't solve it? I think in my case I only had to disable one of those two, the display of the effects or the mask display, not necessarily both. In the end, I decided to not use the gradient effect and use the soft edge effect instead, so I can keep the display of both en...

I remember noticing a slow down that was dependent on zoom, yes. I concluded it was being caused by a combination of masks and shape effects like gradients, so not using that effect or disabling the display of shape effects or masks, both solved the slowdown. I'm guessing your problem has a similar ...

Honestly, we just knew about the good news. I thought it was done by Moho's side, sorry for the confusion. Try the search for "liquid shape" .. that does (now) find references in 1.02 and 4.01, but it still doesn't pick up the references in "Appendix A" (or in the body text of o...

The web search was fixed already. Searching now finds the words not only in the titles but the text inside too. Comunicating it would have been nice because I guess many people just stopped using that web manual.

I have a trick for creating the patch layer effect without using a patch layer. It's very handy because the technique works with groups, unlike regular patch layers. I'll throw together an example and post it this afternoon or evening. Cool, a patching trick. Looking forward to it. +1 (: I always w...

I think we are talking about different things here. If I understood correctly, OP is talking about the placement of existing keyframes, not about interpolation modes.

I think there is no way to spread those keyframes exactly at 2s, 4s, etc, but you can spread them manually all at the same time instead of one by one using alt-drag on selected keyframes and looking to leave them where they are equally spaced as you want. Another option is to use Animation - Scale k...

You're welcome! If you are going to dive into liquid shapes, I totally recomend you to use the Shapes window script, by Rai López: https://www.lostmarble.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=36508. It makes so much easier to understand and use liquid shapes. I was having a hard time understanding them without ...

I would try different masking solutions to see if you can make it render correctly in the workspace, or use liquid shapes to reduce complexity as Wes sugested. You can also ignore it because it renders correctly outside of the workspace, but if the rig is going to be used a lot it's cool to have it ...

Thanks for sharing! I imagine this will be very handy to delete or move those specific keyframes, right? What is the most common use case you have in mind?